{"id":6383,"date":"2026-04-16T08:52:58","date_gmt":"2026-04-16T12:52:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/?p=6383"},"modified":"2026-04-16T08:52:59","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T12:52:59","slug":"understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/","title":{"rendered":"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Polyethylene (PE) films are often viewed negatively in sustainability discussions. However, when evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, <strong>PE films frequently show a lower carbon footprint than heavier packaging materials such as paper, glass, aluminum, and steel<\/strong>. This article explains why, using established climate science and comparative LCA principles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What Is a Carbon Footprint?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A <strong>carbon footprint<\/strong> represents the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with a product throughout its entire life cycle. These emissions are expressed as <strong>kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO\u2082e)<\/strong>, allowing different greenhouse gases to be compared on a common scale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Carbon footprints are calculated using <strong>Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)<\/strong>, a standardized method defined by <strong>ISO 14040 and ISO 14044<\/strong>. An LCA takes a cradle-to-grave perspective, accounting for emissions from raw material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and end-of-life treatment such as recycling, landfill, or energy recovery. This approach provides a science-based framework for comparing different materials fairly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What Is Global Warming Potential (GWP)?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Global Warming Potential (GWP)<\/strong> measures how much heat a greenhouse gas traps in the atmosphere relative to carbon dioxide (CO\u2082), which is assigned a reference value of 1. Carbon footprint results are most commonly reported using <strong>GWP over a 100-year time horizon (GWP100)<\/strong>, in line with IPCC recommendations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>By converting all greenhouse gas emissions into <strong>CO\u2082 equivalents<\/strong>, GWP enables consistent comparisons between materials, processes, and products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Carbon Footprint of PE Films<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Industry LCA data and environmental databases indicate that <strong>virgin polyethylene production typically emits approximately 1.7 to 3.5 kg CO\u2082e per kilogram of resin<\/strong>, depending on factors such as regional energy mix, production technology, and process efficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A key advantage of polyethylene is its compatibility with recycling. <strong>Incorporating recycled PE (post-consumer or post-industrial) can reduce carbon emissions by 30\u201360% or more<\/strong> compared to virgin material, significantly improving overall life cycle performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Why PE Films Often Perform Well from a Climate Perspective<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One of the primary reasons PE films often exhibit lower carbon footprints is their <strong>lightweight nature<\/strong>. Because PE films require far less material to perform the same packaging function, they reduce emissions associated with raw material extraction, manufacturing, and transportation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Manufacturing efficiency also plays an important role. Polyethylene production benefits from decades of process optimization, continuous operation, and relatively moderate processing temperatures compared to glass and metals. When materials are compared based on <strong>functional performance rather than weight alone<\/strong>, PE films frequently show a lower overall climate impact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Comparison with Other Packaging Materials<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Paper and cardboard can appear favorable when emissions are measured per kilogram of material, partly due to biogenic carbon stored in wood fibers. However, paper packaging often requires substantially more material mass to achieve equivalent strength, moisture resistance, or barrier performance. When comparisons are made on a functional basis\u2014such as protecting a given quantity of product\u2014PE films can match or outperform paper in terms of total carbon footprint.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Glass packaging is significantly more energy-intensive to produce due to high-temperature furnaces and heavy material weight. These factors also increase transportation emissions, leading to consistently higher life cycle greenhouse gas emissions than lightweight plastic films.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Aluminum and steel present similar challenges. While metals can be recycled effectively, their primary production is highly energy-intensive. Aluminum smelting in particular carries a substantial carbon burden unless powered by low-carbon electricity. Across most packaging applications, LCAs show metals to have higher life cycle GWP than PE films. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Important Nuances and Limitations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Material comparisons must always be conducted using <strong>equivalent functional units<\/strong>, such as the ability to protect a product, maintain shelf life, and support logistics requirements. End-of-life scenarios also have a major influence on results, as recycling rates, landfill practices, and energy recovery differ by region. Finally, regional electricity grids play a critical role: cleaner energy sources reduce emissions for all materials, not just plastics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is also important to note that <strong>carbon footprint is only one environmental indicator<\/strong>. It does not address littering, biodiversity impacts, or microplastic concerns, which require separate assessment frameworks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Key Takeaways<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>PE films are often among the <strong>lowest-carbon packaging options<\/strong> when evaluated using full life cycle assessments. Lightweight design is a major advantage, particularly in transport-intensive supply chains. Increasing recycled content further improves climate performance. Ultimately, <strong>material selection decisions should be based on life cycle data and functional performance, not material category alone<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>ISO 14040 &amp; ISO 14044<\/strong> \u2013 <em>Life Cycle Assessment Standards<\/em><br>International Organization for Standardization.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6)<\/strong> \u2013 <em>Global Warming Potential Factors<\/em><br>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>PlasticsEurope Eco-profiles<\/strong> \u2013 <em>Environmental Data for Polyethylene (LDPE, LLDPE, HDPE)<\/em><br>PlasticsEurope Association.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Franklin Associates \/ American Chemistry Council<\/strong> \u2013 <em>Life Cycle Inventory of Packaging Materials<\/em><br>Comparative LCAs for plastics, paper, glass, and metals.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>European Commission \u2013 Joint Research Centre (JRC)<\/strong> \u2013 <em>Product Environmental Footprint Guidance for Packaging<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Polyethylene (PE) films are often viewed negatively in sustainability discussions. However, when evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, PE films frequently show a lower carbon footprint than heavier packaging materials such as paper, glass, aluminum, and steel. This article explains why, using established climate science and comparative LCA principles. What Is a Carbon Footprint? &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/\">Continued<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":6384,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":true,"content-type":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-developpement-durable"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials - PolyExpert<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials - PolyExpert\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Polyethylene (PE) films are often viewed negatively in sustainability discussions. However, when evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, PE films frequently show a lower carbon footprint than heavier packaging materials such as paper, glass, aluminum, and steel. This article explains why, using established climate science and comparative LCA principles. What Is a Carbon Footprint? &hellip; Continued\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"PolyExpert\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PolyExpertfilms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-16T12:52:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-16T12:52:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Blog-16.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Arnaud Fischer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@GroupPolyexpert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@GroupPolyexpert\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Arnaud Fischer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Arnaud Fischer\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/fcda70b1d6ea6c273a6b3d32d5caf92a\"},\"headline\":\"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T12:52:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-16T12:52:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":781,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Blog-16.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"D\u00e9veloppement durable\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/\",\"name\":\"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials - PolyExpert\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Blog-16.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-16T12:52:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-16T12:52:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/fcda70b1d6ea6c273a6b3d32d5caf92a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Blog-16.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/Blog-16.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/16\\\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"PolyExpert\",\"description\":\"Experts de la fabrication de pellicule de poly\u00e9thyl\u00e8ne\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/fcda70b1d6ea6c273a6b3d32d5caf92a\",\"name\":\"Arnaud Fischer\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c38d0d0744bd2c6767bb25779bbfe2ddc40147c322f4d1142aca02b3bc33a804?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c38d0d0744bd2c6767bb25779bbfe2ddc40147c322f4d1142aca02b3bc33a804?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/c38d0d0744bd2c6767bb25779bbfe2ddc40147c322f4d1142aca02b3bc33a804?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Arnaud Fischer\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.polyexpert.com\\\/en\\\/author\\\/arnaud\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials - PolyExpert","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials - PolyExpert","og_description":"Polyethylene (PE) films are often viewed negatively in sustainability discussions. However, when evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, PE films frequently show a lower carbon footprint than heavier packaging materials such as paper, glass, aluminum, and steel. This article explains why, using established climate science and comparative LCA principles. What Is a Carbon Footprint? &hellip; Continued","og_url":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/","og_site_name":"PolyExpert","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/PolyExpertfilms\/","article_published_time":"2026-04-16T12:52:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-04-16T12:52:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Blog-16.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Arnaud Fischer","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@GroupPolyexpert","twitter_site":"@GroupPolyexpert","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Arnaud Fischer","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/"},"author":{"name":"Arnaud Fischer","@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/fcda70b1d6ea6c273a6b3d32d5caf92a"},"headline":"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials","datePublished":"2026-04-16T12:52:58+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-16T12:52:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/"},"wordCount":781,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Blog-16.jpg","articleSection":["D\u00e9veloppement durable"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/","url":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/","name":"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials - PolyExpert","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Blog-16.jpg","datePublished":"2026-04-16T12:52:58+00:00","dateModified":"2026-04-16T12:52:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/fcda70b1d6ea6c273a6b3d32d5caf92a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Blog-16.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Blog-16.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/2026\/04\/16\/understanding-the-carbon-footprint-of-pe-films-vs-other-packaging-materials\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Understanding the Carbon Footprint of PE Films vs. Other Packaging Materials"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/","name":"PolyExpert","description":"Experts de la fabrication de pellicule de poly\u00e9thyl\u00e8ne","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/fcda70b1d6ea6c273a6b3d32d5caf92a","name":"Arnaud Fischer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c38d0d0744bd2c6767bb25779bbfe2ddc40147c322f4d1142aca02b3bc33a804?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c38d0d0744bd2c6767bb25779bbfe2ddc40147c322f4d1142aca02b3bc33a804?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c38d0d0744bd2c6767bb25779bbfe2ddc40147c322f4d1142aca02b3bc33a804?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Arnaud Fischer"},"url":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/author\/arnaud\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6383\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polyexpert.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}